With a Gammaxx cooler we were able to maintain a With strong single-core scores, the X should offer very strong gaming performance but in reality it is let down by its memory controller, which, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency.

The X severely bottlenecks a S: gamers should investigate the K, which is both cheaper and faster. The X is compatible with both the new series and series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the X has a slightly greater effective speed than the Xalthough further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the X offers value for money to workstation users.

Even though the X excels at video production, streamers should look elsewhere. We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings.

The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades. Save as guest. Game EFps. Watch Gameplay. Effective Speed. Real World Speed. Benchmark your CPU here. Aircraft carrier. Average Score.

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Memory Avg. Memory Latency Overclocked Score. Memory OC Memory Latency Market Share. See market share leaders. Nice To Haves. Age Newest 15 Months Much more recent.

Average Bench User Builds. Systems with these CPUs. Group Test Results Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison. Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance. Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

Bench your build Size up your PC in less than a minute. How it works - Download and run UserBenchMark.

Ryzen 7 2700X vs. Ryzen 7 3700X: High Refresh Gaming Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions.That is, performance in esports style of games didn't differ greatly than when we tested modern AAA games using high and ultra graphics quality presets. Clearly, the 3rd-gen Ryzen processor was able to hold its own and even pulled ahead in a few instances. This had us wondering how well the previous generation R7 X would stack up against the X, and of course, the iK, under the same test conditions.

So we've gone back, tested and added the X to the results in this benchmark comparison. We also took the time to overhaul our CSGO testing using a method recommended by a number of very keen Counter-Strike gamers.

Also, in our original review we found that a 5. First up we have Battlefield at p using the low quality preset and already we face some interesting results.

This highlights the kind of step forward AMD made with the Zen 2 architecture. The p results are a little more favorable as we start to see the test conditions become a little more GPU bound. Of course, in the process AMD drove down Intel pricing, but still the margin between the X and K is truly massive.

For testing CSGO, we previously moved away from the community benchmark to bot matches which more accurately represented real gameplay, but getting accurate data with bots can be tricky.

Using the pro match we see that the X and K are much more evenly matched. That's a massive generational performance leap. The margins remain about the same at p. Next up we have the Rainbow Six Siege results where we find our biggest margins yet. Again, for max performance in a title such as PUBG, the Intel processor is clearly the superior option, though most may not require north of fps in this title. We should note that by default Rocket League caps the frame rate to fps, though it can be removed by editing a configuration file.

World of Tanks is a slow-paced tank shooter where positioning is more important than flick shots, so Hz displays that are fed fps will be more than sufficient for this one. That being the case the X is perfectly fine for World of Tanks gaming as it allowed for over fps at all times.

The margins seen at p are much the same. In the graph below you can check out the average performance seen across the 9 games we just tested. Those are some truly impressive generational performance gains. This also highlights that anything faster than the RTX Super is mostly pointless for competitive gaming.

Something else worth noting is a 2-year-old feature we wrote, comparing the Ryzen 7 X and Core i7 K on a 35 game benchmark. Fast forward to today and the K, which has essentially been re-branded as the Kis still faster than the X in all games. There is no question AMD has taken a significant leap with Zen 2. In our opinion, gaming performance is so close now relative to Intel that it won't make a difference for the vast majority of gamers. Hopefully they can also provide some decent IPC gains with future generations.Overview Prices Specs.

Comparison winner. AMD Ryzen 7 X. General info Performance Memory Features Benchmarks. Has NX bit. Scroll down for more details. Which are the most popular comparisons? General info 1. Supports bit. AMD Ryzen 9 X. It also allows you to run bit apps. Small semiconductors provide better performance and reduced power consumption.

Chipsets with a higher number of transistors, semiconductor components of electronic devices, offer more computational power. A small form factor allows more transistors to fit on a chip, therefore increasing its performance. The thermal design power TDP is the maximum amount of power the cooling system needs to dissipate. A lower TDP typically means that it consumes less power.

Newer versions can support more bandwidth and deliver better performance. CPU temperature. If the CPU exceeds the maximum operating temperature then problems such as random resets can occur. Has integrated graphics. Performance 1.

2700x vs 3900x

CPU speed. The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores processing units. It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores. CPU threads. More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

L2 cache. A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance. L3 cache. A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance. When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

L1 cache. A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.The memory controller is significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations and shows a better write throughput than the lower spec models, but it still shows relatively high latency which adversely impacts gaming.

2700x vs 3900x

In terms of core performance at this price point, there is no threat from Intel. The X is compatible with both the new series and series of motherboards.

Early benchmarks indicate that the X has a slightly greater effective speed than the Xalthough further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the X offers value for money to workstation users. Even though the X excels at video production, streamers should look elsewhere. We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating.

Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

Save as guest. Game EFps. Watch Comparable Gameplay: X vs X. Effective Speed. Real World Speed. Benchmark your CPU here. Aircraft carrier. Average Score. Memory Avg. Memory Latency Overclocked Score. Memory OC Memory Latency Market Share. See market share leaders. Nice To Haves. Age Newest 15 Months Much more recent.On hand today we have the Ryzen 9 X and Ryzen 7 X, with more content to come in the next few days. It runs at a base frequency of 3.

This means Intel will have a slight performance advantage, but keep in mind that the cost of the cooler will be factored into our value analysis for each processor. We'll also provide some X and X performance figures using an all-in-one liquid cooler. The Ryzen 7 X was equally impressive. These new 3rd-gen Ryzen parts are already looking like kings of productivity. The X also did well hitting points and that placed it roughly on par with the K, so this is a massive performance improvement for Ryzen.

Overall a remarkable performance uplift over the 2nd-gen parts. King of productivity right there. Then when it comes to decompression work, 3rd-gen Ryzen still enjoys a handy performance advantage. Making these results more impressive is that Premiere is a very pro-Intel piece of software. Next up we have V-ray 1. Using the older build the X took 48 seconds to complete the workload while the X took 68 seconds.

This meant the X was slightly slower than the K but much faster than the K. Meanwhile the X beat everything including the X. We see similar margins in the newer version, though here the Core iX manages to edge ahead of the X. Once again we see similar margins between the tested processors, though this time the X is much closer to the K than it is to the X.

Well, would you look at that.

2700x vs 3900x

The R7 X consumed less power than the previous-gen and even less than the Core iK. In fact it was comparable to the Ryzen 5 and along with the old quad-core K. Just as remarkable is the X which is comparable to the X and X, making it worlds more efficient than the K and X.

This is an stellar result for AMD and on that high note lets cautiously move into the gaming benchmarks. Battlefield V sees 3rd-gen Ryzen parts trailing Intel's Core i9s again. The X did better relative to the K, but again gaming looks solid on Intel's side. Bumping the resolution up to p reduces the margins significantly.

We were hoping these 3rd-gen Ryzen processors would be a little more punchy in The Division 2. Far Cry New Dawn has always been troublesome for Ryzen processors. Not a big difference though and as you might expect the gaming experience was identical.

DDR is the fastest spec memory AMD recommends using with 3rd-gen Ryzen as higher clocked memory will actually reduce performance, at least when clocked higher than as this changes the Infinity Fabric to a mode rather than On this site you can find only relevant sports betting information - no unimportant news, no trivial info or any other wasters of your time and Internet bandwidth.

Predictions and analysis are not manipulated by anyone in any way. Every estimation or prediction is based on exact data, analyzed, processed and produced by specially designed computer software. In this Pinnacle Sports Review we are going to present the undisputed best bookmaker for the professional bettors. Madeira makar51277 1 AH 01. Pauli vs Duisburg spooner 12. Truiden vs Waregem midas 12. Catolica fcptips pending 09. Madeira makar51277 1 AH 0 0d 12h 2mSouthampton vs Arsenal liverpool X2 0d 12h 32mSt.

Pauli vs Duisburg spooner 1 0d 13h 2mNordsjaelland vs Hobro babetko Over 2. De Chile Deportes Iquique U. Rivadavia HOME DNB Dep. Espanola Everton HOME DNB Dorking Tooting and Mitcham HOME DNB Leatherhead Burgess Hill HOME DNB Lowestoft Enfield Town HOME DNB Bury AFC Wimbledon HOME DNB Accrington Swindon HOME DNB Hednesford Buxton HOME DNB Matlock Rushall HOME DNB Stafford Lancaster HOME DNB Stourbridge Farsley HOME DNB Warrington 1.

Monchengladbach Schalke HOME DNB Alzenau Baunatal HOME WIN Hadamar 1. Pauli II AWAY DNB Jeddeloh Hamburger SV II AWAY DNB TSV Steinbach Hoffenheim II HOME DNB Rodinghausen Alemannia Aachen HOME DNB RW Essen Uerdingen AWAY DNB Viktoria Koln 1. HOME DNB Boavista 1. A teaser bet may be the answer. A teaser allows you to change the spread, often 6.

You need to tease at least two bets, and a two-pick teaser returns even money. You can stay within one sport or game or cross over into other sports and games.

Silverstein, an assistant managing editor at CBS Sports, has been picking NFL games since 2002. Though he will take the occasional underdog, Silverstein often looks for value with the favorites, especially after sharp money comes in and lines fall below key numbers.

This method allowed him to open the 2017 college football season 19-11-1 ATS after finishing the 2016 season picking gridiron games at a 62 percent clip. He has a hot hand on NFL picks, too. In fact, he's on a 14-7, 67-percent run on selections. Now, he has two games to package as part of a teaser bet, shaving 6. Here's one we can tell you: Silverstein is big on a Patriots line of just -2.

New England is on a quest to defend its Super Bowl championship, winners of seven in a row and tied with Pittsburgh atop the AFC at 9-2.

Of the Patriots' nine victories, three came by eight points or less. But they were all by three points or more. Buffalo ended a three-game losing streak by downing the fading Chiefs 16-10 in Kansas City.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

At 6-5, the Bills really need a win if they have any chance to challenge the Pats in the AFC East, and a victory puts them in a favorable position in the crowded playoff picture. New England's offense has overwhelmed foes, ranking No. Tom Brady is having another MVP year, leading the league in passing yards (3,374) with 26 touchdowns and just three interceptions.

Asking any team to win on the road by two scores is a tough sell, but asking New England to win in Buffalo by a single field goal. That sounds pretty good. Silverstein also has a lot of confidence in an even bigger favorite he's dropping the spread for, and he's sharing that over at SportsLine.

So what is Silverstein's teaser play of the week. Visit SportsLine now to see which lines look irresistible when you shave off a few points, all from the man who's a scorching 14-7 run on NFL picks, and find out. CBS Sports is a registered trademark of CBS Broadcasting Inc.AMAT Stock Forecast Summary: Record Results for AMAT in the Third Quarter of Fiscal 2017 New Era of Artificial Intelligence Business and Financial Outlook for the Upcoming Periods I Know First Bullish Forecast on AMAT Read The Full Premium Article Subscribe to receive exclusive PREMIUM content Here algorithm performance algotrading AMAT Artificial Intelligence Premium premium articlePremiumPages:1234567.

Detailed information on the use of cookies on this Site, and how you can decline them, is provided in our cookie policy. By using this Site or clicking on "OK", you consent to the use of cookies. Our mission is to help leaders in multiple sectors develop a deeper understanding of the global economy. Our flagship business publication has been defining and informing the senior-management agenda since 1964. Article - McKinsey Quarterly - October 2016 Chinese consumers: Revisiting our predictions By Yuval Atsmon and Max Magni Chinese consumers: Revisiting our predictions Article Actions Share this article on LinkedIn Share this article on Twitter Share this article on Facebook Email this article Download this article As their incomes rise, Chinese consumers are trading up and going beyond necessities.

In 2011, we tried our hand at predicting the ways in which, in the decade to come, Chinese consumers would change their preferences and behaviors. This article takes stock of those predictions. Why check in now. Another is a comprehensive new McKinsey survey, which follows nearly ten years of previous research that includes interviews with more than 60,000 people in upward of 60 cities in China. Deeper and more nuanced understanding of Chinese consumers can help reveal fresh opportunitiesfor new entrants and incumbents alikeand signal those areas where established players may need to be more wary.

While geographic differences persist, Chinese consumers are, on the whole, more individualistic, more willing to pay for nonnecessities and discretionary items, more brand loyal, and more willing to trade up to more expensive purchaseseven as their hallmark pragmatism endures. Just as it was then, generalizing about Chinese consumers continues to be almost as difficult (and maybe as foolish) as it is to generalize about European consumers.

We predicted these differences would remainand even grow more significant, especially in the consumption patterns and tastes that relate to discretionary items. To help companies better tailor their go-to-market approach, we grouped most cities in China into clusters based on their similarities, including their geographic proximity and the transportation infrastructure that connects them.

Furthermore, when our latest survey compared the consumers in the Shanghai area to those around Beijing and Hangzhou, certain spending attitudes also showed marked differences. For example, brand loyalty increased much faster in Shanghai (24 percent increase in three years versus just 7 percent in Beijing and 9 percent in Hangzhou), as did the willingness to pay for better or healthier products.

Despite geographic differences, there are broad similarities among Chinese consumers. These mirror the general trends economists have found among consumers around the world as economies develop. The general tendency is for consumers, as they earn more, to spend a lower percentage of their income on food, a little more on healthcare, and even more on travel and transportation, as well as on recreational activities.

It was no great stretch then, in our report five years ago, to predict a significant shift in consumption from necessities and seminecessities into discretionary categories. Sure enough, our new survey shows Chinese consumers following the anticipated pattern. When we asked how they plan to increase spending as their income increases, dramatically fewer consumers said they will increase it on food (46 percent in the latest survey, compared to the 76 percent who said they would do so three years earlier).

Responses trended slightly up for healthcare products (from 16 percent to 17 percent), and increased for travel (from 14 percent to 23 percent) and leisure (from 17 percent to 25 percent). In our previous predictions, we also argued that as the income of Chinese consumers grew, they would aspire to improve their quality of life by not only spending more on discretionary items, but also by shifting their spending to more expensive items in the same categories.

In necessity categories such as food, for example, we predicted consumers would be willing to spend more for healthier versions of the same productsfor instance, that olive oil would grow much faster than less healthy (and less expensive) oils.

In seminecessity categories like apparel, we predicted people would buy more special-occasion and premium brands. We anticipated that the strongest beneficiaries of these changes would be in the more discretionary and aspirational categories, such as skincare and automotive.

So what has happened so far. Premium categories have really accelerated.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *